A weblog with random thoughts and reflections on society and ecology.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Tuesday, December 24, 2002
Worldviews and Social Change
Moving from Madison to Eugene, I have had many opportunities to reflect on the importance of deeper worldviews for social change work. In Madison, there seems to be more of a cooperative spirit and a higher skills level overall among the community groups. In Eugene, I have seen more polarization, fragmentation, and lack of basics skills. There are of course exceptions in both cases.
First, I think that the change model we operate from is of vital importance. How do we see social change come about? Is it through an adversarial approach, or through alliances and partnerships? In Sustain Dane, Madison, we had no enemies. Everybody were potential partners. If a partnership could help move an organization or the community one small step closer to sustainability, we would do it. If nothing else, it would create a connection that could prove very valuable in the future. I think the consistent partnership approach partly came from a realization that we are all in the same boat. There is much room for improvement, for all of us. There is nobody to blame, and we all need to work together to make a change. For some, it may seem naive, but I think it is maybe the most effective way of bringing about long term change.
From that deeper worldview, choice of specific strategies and actions emerge.
Do we choose to set aside differences on smaller issues to form alliances to work on common overall goals? My view is that ideology is very dangerous in this work. We need to be flexible and keep the long-term goal in view: creating a more life-centered culture.
Do we treat others with respect - and consistently use a respectful language? I feel that consistently respectful views and language is essential. It is from practical considerations: If we put anyone down, it tends to create divisions, polarization and distrust. This in turn makes us less effective. Also, if we do not have a respectful attitude towards another person, how can we expect to have an effective partnership?
Do we choose to focus mainly on solutions? Solutions is what many are craving currently, and examples of good solutions gives hope and enthusiasm. It also helps build an alternative to existing structures and options.
Do we, as a person or organization, choose to work to stop destruction? The answer may very well be "yes" even if we also choose a partnership approach. It mainly determines HOW we go about stopping destruction. We can engage effectively in public campaigns, and even in lawsuits if need be, and yet to it respectfully. It allows "the other side" to more easily make concessions, and it opens for an active partnership in the future. An respectful approach also tends to give raise to respect and sympathy from the public for your cause.
20:41
|
|
| |
|
|
|
